During vehicle theft examinations, our clients have but a single goal: to accurately identify those responsible for a reported theft event. The days have come and gone of depending solely on an ignition lock examination and evidence of forced entry to support conclusive theft determinations. These types of examinations often do not provide sufficient evidence to support conclusive or defendable determinations. On occasions where a denial of the claim is deemed appropriate, an incomplete examination can be considered a lack of due diligence and often opens the door to a potential bad faith claim.
Our investigators and experts have assembled 26 categories of examination and 80 separate evidence indicators consistent with theft motives (including traditional theft-for-profit or owner insured involvement). These indicators have been developed in concert with (and during) actual investigations, in-person investigator interviews, and peer reviews.
The goals of our protocol driven examination process is to identify, document, and assess the evidence revealed during an examination; while at the same time assembling the documentation required to support our opinions regarding the most probable responsible party of the reported theft event.
As with all investigations, our only goal is to reveal the truth and identify those responsible for a reported theft event.
Pacific Rim’s only goal is to reveal the truth and report it accurately.
We are truth seekers, not case makers.